What Should You Really Look out for in a Good E-Mini Trading Room?
  • Rating trading rooms has become the latest news on the planet of e-mini trading. Oddly enough, I had spent very little of your last 8 years looking at other trading sites or mentoring programs. Out of your blue, Dean Handley starts a trading room rating service based on his own methodology with very mixed results as well as a tepid reception from the e-mini trading community. Hot on his heels was Emmett Moore, at tradingschools.org, who began a campaign for transparency in trading rooms; he wanted proof the vendor was actually trading, was transparent in showing his DOM, and redacted brokerage statements proving the operator had not been only trading but trading profitably.


    From the onset, i want to state that trading rooms are merely places for people who either don't wish to trade alone (retail trading may be a lonely business) or don't would like to learn to trade. That being said, this sets up the perfect chance for a trading educator to make a fast buck away from an inexperienced trader or perhaps the trading operator has the option for making the space the place where people can share a handful of ideas and also make some money. After reading more reviews than I care to admit, I used to be dismayed to uncover a large number of trading rooms simply are substandard. Here is a few things i think a good room ought to have:

    The lead trader really should be trading with people in your room: It seems where there are a large number of Gap trading room where moderator fails to actually trade but alternatively offers an ongoing monologue concerning the merits of trading at this particular level or that level but never actually specifies specific entries and exits. This reminds me with the President's "State from the Union" speech and the news commentary that follows. Which would be to claim that a small grouping of talking heads hashes over just what POTUS says and explains it into the audience; either the networks have a very low opinion of public education or desperately need to fill the atmosphere with willy-nilly blather about something I really listened to and understood.

    Without any DOM up traders cannot see where you should enter and exit: The DOM will be the heart of your trading experience and proof into the room members that you will be really not a commentator but somebody that actually understands how to trade. Naturally, the danger to the room operator is that he/she might not exactly perform well and so lose members in a rapid rate. One common complaint I hear within my room is always that almost no rooms show a DOM, so it will be challenging to duplicate trades the moderator might or might not call.

    If you are intending to operate an enterprise, you should at the least manage to prove that you can do whatever you say you could do: In my opinion, showing a potential customer a series of highly redacted brokerage statements fails to violate any particular laws. The NFA generally seems to agree with this standard as it has specifically stated simply that; there is nothing wrong with showing a number of redacted brokerage statements. So, if a prospective trading room operator will give you a lot of baloney about violating his client's privacy laws, you could inform them they are really packed with it; it is actually allowed along with the reason most traders don't wish to show brokerage statements is that they would shine a poor light in their trading performance.

    To sum up the review sites are quite disappointing plus a bit disheartening. I came into this business from your world of institutional trading and knew almost no about retail trading or the retail trading business. I am just to opt for transparent trading rooms in which the client knows what he/she actually is purchasing and turns into a fair shake from the trading room operator.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!